@article{oai:nittaidai.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001740,
 author = {府川, 源一郎 and Fukawa, Genichiro},
 issue = {1},
 journal = {日本体育大学大学院教育学研究科紀要, Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education, Nippon Sport Science University},
 month = {Sep},
 note = {本稿では，国語科の授業実践がどのように言語化して記録され，それが分析されてきたか，またそこにどのような問題点があったのかを考える。その対象として，国語科教育の実践記録とその分析の出発点である芦田恵之助の「冬景色」の授業記録とその分析をめぐる事例を取り上げた。なぜなら，芦田の実践記述とそれを分析した垣内松三との関係は，「教育実践」や「記録分析」の主体は誰なのか，という，今日の「授業研究」に通底する問題を含んでいるからである。さらに，そもそも言語がとらえる「事実＝現象」とはどのような性質を持っているのか，という本源的な問題も考察の対象にした。歴史研究の観点からは，芦田恵之助の「冬景色」の授業を記録する文体を再検討して，その特徴を新たな視点から摘出することができた。, In this paper, we consider how the practice of Japanese language courses has been linguisticized and recorded, analyzed, and what problems there were. As a subject, the class record of "Fuyugeshiki(Winter scenery)" of Ashida Enosuke  which is the starting point of the practical record of the Japanese language education and its analysis, and the case concerning the analysis were taken up. The reason is that the relation between Ashida's practice description and the analysis of it with Kaitou Matsuzo includes the problem which is the subject of "educational practice" and "record analysis" and the problem which becomes the bottom in today's "class research". In addition, the original problem of what kind of character "fact=phenomenon" that language catches in the first place was also considered. From the viewpoint of historical research, we were able to re-examin the style of recording Ashida Enosuke's "Fuyugeshiki(Winter scenery)" class and remove its characteristics from a new perspective, 特集論文},
 pages = {11--30},
 title = {国語科実践研究 授業実践の「事実＝現象」はどうとらえられてきたか : 芦田恵之助の「冬景色」の授業と垣内松三の『国語の力』の場合 (特集 教科実践研究)},
 volume = {4},
 year = {2020},
 yomi = {フカワ, ゲンイチロウ}
}